Mich. House Approves Bills Requiring Abortion Clinics To Screen For Coercion, Intimidation

February 8th, 2012

Healthcare Prof:

The Michigan House on Wednesday voted 67-38 to approve a package of bills (HB 5879, HB 5880, HB 5881, HB 5882, HB 5883) that would require abortion clinics to determine if ladies seeking abortions are undergoing the procedure since they have been intimidated or coerced, the AP/Mlive.com reports. The bills also would make coercing and intimidating ladies into seeking an abortion illegal and would give coerced girls the ability to file a civil lawsuit. State Rep. Stephen Adamini (D) introduced an amendment, which the House did not support, that would have created it illegal to coerce a women into undergoing or not undergoing an abortion. Opponents with the bills say the legislation discourages women from seeking abortions, but advocates of the measures say that the bills attempt to “crack down on domestic violence,” the AP/Mlive.com reports. “It is just not about abortion,” state Rep. Judy Emmons (R), a sponsor with the bills, stated, adding, “It is about domestic violence … all aspects of domestic violence and how it affects females.” Adamini stated the approved legislation violates a woman’s constitutional rights and is discriminatory. The bills now move to the state Senate for consideration (Martin, AP/Mlive.com, 7/26).

“Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You’ll be able to view the whole Kaiser Everyday Well being Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Day-to-day Wellness Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a cost-free service of the Henry J. Kaiser Household Foundation . ? 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

CQ’s Carey Addresses Abortion Bill That Would Criminalize Assisting Minors To Skirt State Parental Notification Laws

February 5th, 2012

Healthcare Prof:

Mary Agnes Carey, associate editor of CQ HealthBeat, discusses an abortion-related bill (S 403), passed last week by the Senate, that would permit federal charges to be filed against individuals who violate parental consent and notification laws in this week’s “Health on the Hill from kaisernetwork.org and CQ.” Carey says that Democrats objected to begin immediately a House-Senate conference that would reconcile the Senate-approved version with the bill and a similar House-approved bill (HR 748) (Carey, “Health on the Hill from kaisernetwork.org and CQ,” 7/24).

The complete audio version of “Health on the Hill,” transcript and resources for further research are available on the web.

“Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. It is possible to view the whole Kaiser Daily Well being Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for e-mail delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Every day Well being Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free of charge service with the Henry J. Kaiser Loved ones Foundation . ? 2005 Advisory Board Organization and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

Religion Becoming More Apparent In Abortion-Rights Supporters’ Debate, Column Says

February 3rd, 2012

1 (two votes)

Healthcare Prof:

Religious groups that support abortion rights are “increasingly active and visible,” and “their emphasis on conscience and morality … has the potential to alter the terms of the abortion[-rights] debate,” Brooklyn-based journalist Rebecca Tuhus-Dubrow writes in a Boston Globe column. Like religious abortion-rights opponents, the religious abortion-rights supporters use the Bible to validate their support of abortion rights, Tuhus-Dubrow writes. She adds, “Instead of rights, the [religious abortion-rights] movement tends to emphasize moral agency and conscience,” stressing the “sanctity of life along with the obligation to protect the vulnerable,” which consists first of women and their children. The acknowledgement of a multifaceted moral view of abortion “historically” has been “taboo within the polarized abortion debate,” but the religious abortion-rights movement is “not shy about acknowledging the moral complexity” of the problem, Tuhus-Dubrow writes. Some politicians — including Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), who in January 2005 said that abortion “represents a sad, even tragic option to several, several women” — have “embraced the idea of moral complexity,” in accordance with Tuhus-Dubrow. In spite of the reluctance of some abortion-rights supporters to “embrace the approach” of religious groups that support abortion rights, the “influence of religion is increasingly evident throughout the abortion-rights movement,” Tuhus-Dubrow writes (Tuhus-Dubrow, Boston Globe, 7/30).

“Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You are able to view the whole Kaiser Every day Well being Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Every day Well being Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free of charge service of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . ? 2005 Advisory Board Business and Kaiser Family members Foundation. All rights reserved.

No.1 penis extender over 10 years

February 1st, 2012

When the patients with penis diseases search for the effective products in market, the reviews of the products will be noticed. It is useful way to know more about the products except the official promotion. In some cases, the reviews are more believable. Through reading the related reviews, you will get another first hand tips about the products, the effects and so on. Since thousands of penis products, patients with little professional knowledge will be difficult to make the final decision to solve their troubles. After all, penis health is so important and the result from bad products will be terrible. So the doctors recommendation plus the reviews becomes important. Over 10 years, the x4 labs extender is ranked as the No.1 extender, which can be proved in huge reviews of X4 labs penis extender.
 

Of course, the permanent amazing effects of x4 labs extender for penis diseases is the guarantee for its popularity and great reputation. Security with no any side effects also contributes a lot. Comfort, the convenient set, for example 2100g x4 labs which is easy to take are the advantages compared to other products in market.

If you have any questions or enquires about x4 labs extenders, you can submit your enquires in http://www.x4labs.com/contact.php to get the nice services for your needs at any time. Yes, as you know, the nice support service and the excellent qualities guarantee make the x4 labs extenders competitive .

 

Editorial, Opinion Pieces Respond To Bill That Would Criminalize Assisting Minors To Circumvent State Parental Notification Laws

January 31st, 2012

Healthcare Prof:

An editorial, opinion piece and letter towards the editor respond to a bill (S 403) that would enable federal charges to be filed against any individual who transports minors across state lines for the purpose of evading state abortion parental notification or consent laws. The Senate last week voted 65-34 to approve the bill, which was sponsored by Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.). Below the bill, people who violate the measure would be subject to a fine or as much as 1 year in prison. The measure includes an exception if an abortion is necessary to save the life of a pregnant minor. Furthermore, the bill would bar a father who rapes his daughter from suing anyone who assists in her abortion, as well as bars anyone committing incest on a minor from transporting a minor to another state to obtain an abortion (Kaiser Day-to-day Women’s Health Policy Report, 7/26). Summaries appear below.

Editorial

  • Boston Globe: If supporters of the Senate bill “truly wanted to reduce the incidence of abortion, they would focus on reducing unwanted pregnancy, but a lot of of the exact same senators” who voted for the bill “defeated funding for increased pregnancy prevention grants,” a Globe editorial says. “Criminalizing the act of driving minors to abortion clinics in other states won’t do anything to reduce teen pregnancy, but it could drive teen abortion underground, making it unsafe, as well as illegal,” the editorial says. Supporters with the bill “claim to care about traumatized girls being pressured into having abortions, but this bill would press them into lives of … despair,” the editorial says (Boston Globe, 7/29).

    Opinion Piece

  • Judith Warner, New York Times: “[R]adical Republicans … have cleverly linked [the Senate bill] to 1 with the most basic beliefs of mainstream parenting these days: namely, that parents have a correct to know everything about their children and to control every aspect of their lives,” Warner, author of “Perfect Madness: Motherhood within the Age of Anxiety,” writes in a Times opinion piece. “It is not unreasonable for parents to need to know what’s going on with their kids,” Warner writes, adding, “I would just suggest that parental rights have limits.” She adds that to deny girls seeking abortions “access to freedom from forced pregnancy … is to abuse them” (Warner, New York Times, 7/29).

    Letter to the Editor

  • Carol Roye, New York Times: “[T]he senators who voted for [the Senate bill] got it wrong,” Clark, professor of nursing at Hunter College Schools of the Health Professions, writes in a Times letter to the editor, adding, “If teenagers don’t tell their parents” they strategy to undergo the procedure, “there is usually a good reason.” She concludes, if this bill is signed into law, “[w]ho will protect those teenagers who stand to be abused if they reveal the pregnancy to their parents?” (Roye, New York Times, 7/30).

    “Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You’ll be able to view the whole Kaiser Everyday Wellness Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for e-mail delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Everyday Wellness Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of the Henry J. Kaiser Loved ones Foundation . ? 2005 Advisory Board Business and Kaiser Family members Foundation. All rights reserved.

  • CQ’s Carey Addresses Wellness IT Legislation, Medicare Payments, Abortion Bill

    January 29th, 2012

    Healthcare Prof:

    1 (1 votes)

    Mary Agnes Carey, associate editor of CQ HealthBeat, discusses the House’s passage of health data technology legislation, Medicare physician payments and an abortion-related bill passed last week by the Senate that would enable federal charges to be filed against individuals violating parental consent and notification laws in this week’s “Health on the Hill from kaisernetwork.org and CQ.” Carey notes that the House last week voted 270-148 to approve a bill (S 1418) that would promote use of well being IT. The bill differs from 1 (HR 4157) the Senate approved in November 2005 on privacy, funding and other problems. In other news, lawmakers within the House and Senate have said that they desire to take action this year to reverse a scheduled 5% reduction in Medicare physician payments. Carey notes that such a plan might be challenging because with the complexity with the concern, the limited amount of time left inside the congressional session and funding needed to reverse the cut. CMS Administrator Mark McClellan told lawmakers that CMS would perform with them to address the payment concern but stated that legislators would need to implement new quality measures and other steps prior to putting more funds into the payments. Finally, Carey talks about a bill (S 403) approved by the Senate that would establish as a federal crime the act of taking pregnant minors across state lines to avoid parental notification and contsent laws to obtain abortions. The House has passed a similar bill (HR 748), though some Democrats objected to immediately beginning a House-Senate conference to reconcile the legislation (Carey, “Health on the Hill from kaisernetwork.org and CQ,” 7/31).

    The total audio version of “Health on the Hill,” transcript and resources for further analysis are accessible on-line.

    “Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. It is possible to view the entire Kaiser Everyday Wellness Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for e-mail delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Every day Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free of charge service of the Henry J. Kaiser Household Foundation . 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

    FDA Chief Calls For Meeting With Barr Subsidiary, Says Age Restriction In Nonprescription Plan B Application Ought to Be Raised To 18

    January 26th, 2012

    Healthcare Prof:

    FDA and Barr Laboratories have agreed to meet to discuss the company’s application for nonprescription sales of its emergency contraceptive Program B, FDA announced in a statement Monday, adding that it hoped remaining concerns concerning the application “can be wrapped up in a matter of weeks,” the Philadelphia Inquirer reports (McCullough, Philadelphia Inquirer, 8/1). FDA in May possibly 2004 issued a “not approvable” letter in response to an application originally submitted by pharmaceutical firm Women’s Capital for nonprescription sales of Plan B, which can prevent pregnancy if taken up to 72 hours following sexual intercourse. Women’s Capital later was purchased by Barr (Kaiser Daily Women’s Well being Policy Report, 5/15). The agency cited inadequate data on its use amongst girls younger than age 16. Following FDA rejected Barr’s first application, the firm submitted a revised application to create the drug obtainable only to girls and ladies ages 16 and older (Kaiser Day-to-day Women’s Health Policy Report, 7/23/04). Following FDA rejected Barr’s first application, the firm submitted a revised application to create the drug offered only to girls and females ages 16 and older. Former FDA Commissioner Lester Crawford in August 2005 opened a 60-day public comment period on the application, saying science supported approval of nonprescription Program B access for women and girls ages 17 and older, but the application presented FDA “with a lot of tough and novel policy and regulatory problems,” which includes enforcement of an age restriction. The comment period expired in November 2005, as well as the agency did not indicate when it might make a decision on the application (Kaiser Day-to-day Women’s Wellness Policy Report, 5/25).

    Letter
    A July 31 letter from acting FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach to Barr’s subsidiary Duramed Pharmaceuticals says that 18 will be the “appropriate age” to enable women to buy Plan B without having a prescription (Alonso-Zaldivar, Los Angeles Times, 8/1). Within the letter, von Eschenbach asked Barr to raise the age restriction in its application from age 16 to 18 (Rockoff, Baltimore Sun, 8/1). FDA also requested that Barr make unspecified adjustments to the packaging for Program B and asked for a thorough description of Barr’s strategy to enforce the age restriction (Weiss, Washington Post, 8/1). Barr intends to make nonprescription Strategy B obtainable only at pharmacies — not in gasoline stations or convenience stores — and to require that the pills be placed behind the counter and that individuals purchasing the medication present photo identification, the New York Times reports (Saul, New York Times, 8/1). Von Eschenbach within the letter wrote that FDA desires to learn more about Barr’s strategy to monitor pharmacies’ compliance with all the age restriction and what the company plans to do “if a pharmacy fails to comply with them.” Von Eschenbach added, “If after our discussions we conclude (your) program isn’t sufficiently rigorous … Strategy B will stay [prescription]-only for ladies of all ages” (Graham, Chicago Tribune, 8/1). The letter “stopped far short” of saying FDA will approve Barr’s application, but the consideration of the application is a reversal of a previous implication that the agency might not have the legal authority to approve the application with an age restriction, the Washington Post reports (Washington Post, 8/1). The letter addresses the agency’s authority to approve the application and says that after reviewing a summarized and categorized contractor’s report, submitted Might 19, on the roughly 47,000 public comments, FDA agrees with all the majority of comments that stated it is not necessary to “engage in rule making” to address the age-related regulatory concerns (FDA letter, 7/31). The letter requests a meeting with Barr within seven days (Rackl, Chicago Sun-Times, 8/1).

    Reaction
    Barr CEO Bruce Downey said he is pleased with FDA’s communication but added that the proof will be within the outcome with the application. He said the company’s age-restriction strategy “provides adequate safeguards,” adding that he still believes the drug must be accessible without having a prescription to females and girls of all ages (Wilde Mathews, Wall Street Journal, 8/1). Barr spokesperson Carol Cox said that the business requirements to meet with FDA to receive “some clarity” about what FDA officials need from the organization (Rubin, USA Today, 8/1). She also stated that the company had some concerns about what Barr would be required to show to be in accordance with the letter’s specifications but added that Barr could be “pleased to set up a meeting as soon as possible with FDA.” She said, “Overall, I think [the letter is] a positive development” (Washington Post, 8/1). HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said the letter shows a “good-faith effort on the portion of Dr. von Eschenbach to support resolve the concerns surrounding Program B” (Los Angeles Times, 8/1). In addition, the announcement has “raised hopes” among nonprescription Strategy B advocates that the “unusually glacial assessment of Plan B might soon accelerate,” according to the Post (Washington Post, 8/1).

    Von Eschenbach Confirmation Hearing Begins
    The Senate Committee on Wellness, Education, Labor and Pensions on Tuesday is scheduled to hold a confirmation hearing on the nomination of von Eschenbach to permanently head the agency (Kaiser Every day Women’s Health Policy Report, 7/26). FDA spokesperson Susan Bro stated the agency made the letter public “in anticipation of needing to bring before the committee … the agency’s response to the evaluation process” of Strategy B and to “resolve what has been one of the most divisive issues this agency has faced” (Carey/Crowley, CQ Today, 7/31). Bro said that von Eschenbach wanted to talk to the committee about the agency’s plan for a choice on the Strategy B application, adding, “This is a model for how he currently makes decisions and will continue to as the leader of this critically important public well being issue” (New York Times, 8/1). She also said von Eschenbach did not want Strategy B to be the focus of the hearing, adding he “believes that resolving this concern is a critical step in moving the agency’s agenda forward” (USA Today, 8/1).

    Murray, Rodham Clinton Continue Hold on Nomination
    Sens. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) on Monday reiterated their program to place a hold on von Eschenbach’s nomination until FDA makes a final choice on Barr’s application (USA Today, 8/1). The agency’s announcement on Monday was “nothing more than yet another delay tactic,” Murray and Rodham Clinton said in a statement, adding, “Rather than moving this method forward and doing appropriate by the American people, the [Bush] administration is continuing to play a game of smoke and mirrors the day before Dr. von Eschenbach’s Senate confirmation hearing” (Pugh, McClatchy/Charlotte Observer, 8/1). Murray and Rodham Clinton said the hold must be sufficient to block von Eschenbach’s confirmation (USA Today, 8/1). Even so, if Bush gives von Eschenbach the job through a recess appointment, their efforts would be unsuccessful, they stated (Washington Post, 8/1). The White House declined to comment on the hold (USA Today, 8/1).

    Related Editorial
    “If the FDA is truly ready to give Program B its approval, then von Eschenbach surely will not mind a brief delay in his confirmation although the agency along with the drug maker work out the details” of the agreement, a Los Angeles Times editorial says. Even though FDA’s announcement comes at an “awfully convenient” time, if the agency “follows through” using the approval of Program B for nonprescription sales, then U.S. women will be the “real winners,” the editorial says, concluding, “[M]aybe Monday’s announcement is a sign that the FDA is less interested in acting as the judge of women’s morals than as the protector of their health” (Los Angeles Times, 8/1).

    Related Lawsuit
    The Center for Reproductive Rights in a July 21 letter to a federal judge requested that the White House present any letters, e-mails or records of conversations its staff exchanged with FDA in regard to Barr’s application, the AP/Forbes reports (AP/Forbes, 7/28). CRR — on behalf with the Association of Reproductive Well being Professionals, the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Wellness and others — filed a lawsuit against FDA in a U.S. District Court in New York, claiming the agency did not follow procedure when it denied the original nonprescription Plan B application (Kaiser Day-to-day Women’s Health Policy Report, 5/15). A hearing on the July 21 request — which was sent to federal Magistrate Viktor Pohorelsky, who is hearing arguments within the lawsuit — is scheduled for Thursday in New York City. CRR also is seeking to depose White House official Jay Lefkowitz, the AP/Forbes reports (AP/Forbes, 7/28). CRR attorney Bonnie Jones in May possibly told Pohorelsky that CMS Administrator Mark McClellan, although head of FDA, had a discussion having a White House official about Strategy B. A copy of McClellan’s appointment calendar for April 21, 2003, a few days after Women’s Capital’s application submission, reads, “Conference call w/Jay Lefkowitz re: Plan B submis.” Lefkowitz will be the former deputy assistant to President Bush on domestic policy and currently serves as special envoy on human rights in North Korea (Kaiser Everyday Women’s Well being Policy Report, 5/15). Todd Glass, a spokesperson for CRR, stated the government has requested a continuance in the lawsuit (Washington Post, 8/1).

    Broadcast Coverage
    Several broadcast programs recently reported on FDA’s letter regarding Strategy B:

  • ABCNews’ “World News Tonight”: The segment includes comments from Downey; Murray; and Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Females for America (Stark, “World News Tonight,” ABCNews, 7/31). Total video of the segment is available online.

  • APM’s “Marketplace Morning Report”: The segment includes comments from Bridget Behling, managing editor of the Tan Sheet, a publication covering nonprescription pharmaceutical and nutritional goods; and Brian Laegeler, an analyst for Morningstar (Milne-Tyte, “Marketplace Morning Report,” APM, 8/1). The total segment will be obtainable on the web in RealPlayer a few hours right after the broadcast.

  • NBC’s “Nightly News”: The segment consists of comments from Rodham Clinton; Vanessa Cullins, vice president for medical affairs at Planned Parenthood Federation of America; and Wright (Costello, “Nightly News,” NBC, 7/31). The total segment is obtainable on the internet in Windows Media. Additionally, video of a related MSNBC segment is obtainable on the web in Windows Media.

  • NPR’s “All Things Considered”: The segment includes comments from Bro and Kirsten Moore, president of the Reproductive Wellness Technologies Project (Rovner, “All Things Considered,” NPR, 7/31). The complete segment is accessible on-line in RealPlayer.

  • NPR’s “Morning Edition”: The segment includes comments from Bro and Murray (Rovner, “Morning Edition,” NPR, 8/1). The total segment is available on the internet in RealPlayer.

    “Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Day-to-day Wellness Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for e-mail delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Wellness Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a cost-free service of the Henry J. Kaiser Loved ones Foundation . ? 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

  • Former Oglala Sioux Tribal President To Challenge Impeachment Over Proposed Abortion Clinic Donations Allegation

    January 24th, 2012

    5 (2 votes)

    Healthcare Prof:

    Former Oglala Sioux Tribal President Cecelia Fire Thunder on Friday said she plans to challenge her impeachment by the Tribal Council for allegedly soliciting donations on behalf with the tribe for a proposed abortion clinic with no the council’s approval subsequent week within the tribe’s Supreme Court, the Rapid City Journal reports (Steen, Rapid City Journal, 7/28). Fire Thunder in March in response towards the approval of the South Dakota law (HB 1215) that bans abortion except to save a woman’s life said, “I will personally establish a Planned Parenthood clinic on my own land, which is within the boundaries with the Pine Ridge Reservation where the state of South Dakota has absolutely no jurisdiction.” Nevertheless, Fire Thunder in June said she had not intended to open a clinic that would perform the procedure but rather 1 that would offer household planning data, emergency contraception and other contraceptives. The tribal council last month voted 9-5 to replace Fire Thunder for allegedly soliciting donations with out the council’s approval for the proposed clinic. Tribal Judge Lisa Adams reinstated Fire Thunder last month, arguing that her removal violated tribal procedure. Nonetheless, she retracted her decision soon after receiving a motion that said she did not have the authority to issue an injunction against the tribe or a tribal official and later recused herself from the case (Kaiser Daily Women’s Well being Policy Report, 7/20). Fire Thunder stated she has not received due process in the lower court and is appealing the decision on procedural grounds. When Adams recused herself from Fire Thunder’s case, proceedings were put on hold to enable the tribal council to appoint a new judge. Tribal council attorney Tom Blanco on Friday filed a motion to dismiss Fire Thunder’s case (Rapid City Journal, 7/28).

    Tribe’s View of Abortion
    Tribe members officially have not been surveyed, but a lot of stated they support exceptions to an abortion ban inside the case of rape, incest or to protect the wellness with the pregnant woman, the Chicago Tribune reports. In accordance with Department of Justice statistics, American Indian girls are 3 times more likely to be sexually assaulted than white ladies, and rape and incest are more common on reservations than in the rest with the U.S. Regardless of people’s views on abortion, “people on both sides seem to agree” that “abortion is women’s business, not suitable for men to be discussing within the chambers with the tribal council or anywhere else,” according to the Tribune. The Oglala Tribal Council has passed an ordinance that prohibits abortion procedures on the reservation, the Tribune reports (Peres, Chicago Tribune, 7/30).

    “Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. It is possible to view the entire Kaiser Every day Wellness Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Everyday Well being Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a totally free service of the Henry J. Kaiser Household Foundation . ? 2005 Advisory Board Business and Kaiser Family members Foundation. All rights reserved.

    Tickets Online

    January 23rd, 2012

    There are wisconsin badgers tickets, wisconsin-milwaukee panthers tickets, and wofford terriers tickets.

    Kaiser Every day Women’s Wellness Policy Report Highlights Women’s Well being Policy Concerns Related To 2006 Elections

    January 21st, 2012

    Healthcare Prof:

    The following highlights recent election-related news on women’s wellness issues.

  • California: State Treasurer and gubernatorial candidate Phil Angelides (D) on Friday in San Francisco produced his first public statements in opposition to Proposition 85, a statewide ballot measure that would require doctors to notify parents or guardians just before performing an abortion on a minor, the Sacramento Bee reports (Hecht, Sacramento Bee, 7/29). The measure would require unmarried girls younger than age 18 to inform a parent or legal guardian of their intention to have an abortion 48 hours just before undergoing the procedure. The initiative is similar to Proposition 73, which failed in November 2005, but it eliminates language that defines abortion as resulting in the “death of an unborn child, conceived but not yet born.” In addition, Proposition 85 does not include a provision in Proposition 73 that would have mandated reporting on how numerous judicial waivers a judge has approved (Kaiser Everyday Women’s Health Policy Report, 5/23). “There is now an effort by antichoice extremists to roll back the clock to a much darker day,” Angelides stated, adding, “The fact is, voters of California rejected a similar measure (last year) and said it was wrong for antichoice extremists and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) to jeopardize teen safety.” Schwarzenegger supported Proposition 73 last year but has not publicly stated a position on Proposition 85, according to the Bee. “The governor’s position on parental notification has not changed,” Katie Levinson, Schwarzenegger campaign spokesperson, said, adding, “The people spoke last year” in defeating Proposition 73 (Sacramento Bee, 7/29).

  • Michigan: Abortion-related issues within the 7th District are a key problem within the Republican primary, which is among Rep. Joe Schwarz and Tim Walberg, the Jackson Citizen Patriot reports. Schwarz, a physician and an abortion-rights supporter, has said that the “decision [to have an abortion] really should not be created by a bunch of middle-aged, gray-haired men. … It should be produced by the woman herself.” Walberg, who has called opposition to abortion rights a “moral absolute” and has stated abortion must be illegal with no exceptions, in January was endorsed by Proper to Life of Michigan, the state’s largest abortion-rights opposition group. “The only exception I would give in very, very rare cases … is for the life of the mother,” Walberg said, adding, “Not the well being with the mother. The wellness with the mother is fraught with too several vagaries and potential abuses” (Jackson Citizen Patriot, 7/30).

  • Tennessee: Candidates seeking the Republican nomination inside the U.S. Senate race in Tennessee should focus their campaigns less on abortion-related issues and more on other state concerns in advance with the party’s primary Thursday, Lloyd Daugherty, chair with the state’s Conservative Union, stated Saturday at the group’s annual Reagan Day Dinner in Knoxville, the AP/Knoxville News reports. “Some folks assume that all conservatives care about is abortion and gay marriage,” he said, adding that efforts to ban abortion are “vitally critical, but there is so much more to conservatism.” The three leading candidates for the Republican nomination are Reps. Ed Bryant and Van Hilleary and former Chattanooga Mayor Bob Corker. Bryant and Hilleary have said they would support a state abortion ban that allows exceptions only to save the life of the woman, and Corker has said he would support a ban that allows exceptions for rape and incest and to save the pregnant woman’s life. The winner of Thursday’s primary likely will face Rep. Harold Ford in November (AP/Knoxville News, 7/31).

    “Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You are able to view the whole Kaiser Every day Well being Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for e-mail delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Every day Wellness Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free of charge service with the Henry J. Kaiser Family members Foundation . 2005 Advisory Board Business and Kaiser Loved ones Foundation. All rights reserved.